For my 400th post I wanted to write about something epic. Something all encompassing that effects each and every one of us. Something with the ability to literally change the entire course of human history, to re-write the history books. The kind of thing that no matter who you are or what you do you your life would never be the same after its full impact is felt. After giving it some thought for a few days I think I may have finally found the perfect topic: the looming battle over net neutrality and the end of the World as we know it.
For the uninitiated Net neutrality is the doctrine that makes the World go round. According to Wikipedia net neutrality, “is the principle that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication.” In other words the expectation is that you pay a flat fee to your cable company for unlimited access to the World Wide Web and that’s it. What you do from there is up to you.
If that goes away though everything changes. Suddenly you’ll be getting nickled and dimed to death paying for the right to access specific sites. Want to stay informed and have access to major news sources? That’ll cost you $5 a month extra. Want to add in a sports bundle? Or an entertainment bundle? Or a gaming bundle? All of them will cost you an extra $5-10 per month. And here you thought airline baggage fees were bad.
Ultimately, this means that you’ll have to start making choices. Hard choices about what you want to pay for. This means that when push comes to shove you may have to choose between accessing educational content or sources of entertainment. Which do you think will win out? Not only that but it also means that access to certain information will now be restricted to those that can afford it. Everyone else will get left out in the cold only able to access certain websites at slower speeds than the elite.
We already live in a World where our 2.5 billion poorest people have less combined wealth than our 85 richest people. Do we really want access to the internet to be the cause of widening that gap between the rich and the poor even more? I thought that with initiatives like Google’s Project Loon and Mark Zuckerberg’s Internet.org that the goal was to provide all of those poor people with access to the Internet. How is that going to happen now when you have to pay for access to individual sites?
Equally troubling, at least to me, is what effect the loss of net neutrality will have on the composition of the internet itself. I can’t even get anyone to buy my ebook for $.99. If someone has to pay for separate access to my blog it would be a death sentence for me. Forget about the old saying, “If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it did it really make a sound?” Now we’re going to enter into an age where the predominant saying will become, “If a blog stops getting updated and no one notices did it really happen?”.
So how did this all come about? An article last week from The Verge describes it best:
“A federal appeals court has struck down important segments of the FCC’s Open Internet rules, determining that the agency doesn’t have the power to require internet service providers to treat all traffic equally. The DC circuit court has ruled on Verizon v. FCC, a challenge to the net neutrality rules put in place in 2010, vacating the FCC’s anti-discrimination and anti-blocking policies, though it preserved disclosure requirements that Verizon opposed — in other words, carriers can make some traffic run faster or block other services, but they have to tell subscribers.
The problem isn’t that the court opposed the FCC’s goals, it’s that unlike older telecommunications providers, ISPs aren’t classified as “common carriers” that must pass information through their networks without preference. By enforcing net neutrality, the court found, the agency was imposing rules that didn’t apply to carriers. It’s an issue that net neutrality supporters have been worried about for years: “The FCC — under the leadership of former Chairman Julius Genachowski — made a grave mistake when it failed to ground its Open Internet rules on solid legal footing,” says Free Press president Craig Aaron. “Internet users will pay dearly for the previous chairman’s lack of political will.”
Sadly the term “internet users” doesn’t apply to a narrow segment of the population though. It applies to all of us. Every single one of us. And yet I don’t hear as large of an uproar as I should. I don’t see people complaining on social media or lamenting our fate around the water cooler. In short, I get the sense that people don’t fully realize the scope of this issue. Most people probably didn’t even know what net neutrality was a week ago. They probably thought it was something that Bob Barker used to say at the end of the Price is Right. “Don’t forget to get your net spade or neutered!”
Well that has got to change. I’m certainly no political activist. I didn’t participate in Occupy Wall Street and I worked two blocks away. I’ve never attended a rally of any kind, not even a pep rally. I won’t even consider doing a hunger strike. And yet when it comes to the Internet and how much I’m willing to pay for it I’m willing to take up arms. You should be too if you want to keep reading this blog. Or perusing videos on Netflix. Or posting to social networks. Or watching porn. Or whatever else it is that you currently do on the Internet.
Now if you’ll excuse me there’s about a billion videos on YouTube I have to start watching before I lose access.
This chart details a future that nobody wants. Let’s make sure this doesn’t happen.
Read Full Post »